The years before the first withdrawal are the last years you fully control your taxable income. Six mistakes made in that window shrink retirement income for decades, and most are made quietly, one reasonable-looking decision at a time.
Six, and they compound: claiming Social Security before the decision has been modeled with a spouse's record and the survivor scenario; underestimating the Medicare bridge and the long-term care gap; ignoring taxes and withdrawal order while most savings sit in tax-deferred accounts; holding either too much or too little investment risk as retirement nears; carrying high-interest debt into fixed income; and deciding each of these separately instead of as one coordinated income picture. The late 50s matter because no benefit has started and no required distribution has begun, so taxable income is still under your control.
Before Social Security, pensions and required distributions begin, most of your taxable income is a choice. After they begin, most of it is fixed.
A 20-to-30-year retirement is funded from whatever a household has saved plus whatever income it can arrange, so every claiming and withdrawal choice carries weight that lasts. In the years before the first withdrawal, almost all of those choices are still open: when to claim, what to convert, which account to draw first, how much risk to carry, whether a workplace plan stays or moves. Once benefits and required minimum distributions start, the taxable floor is set and several of those options close.
The six mistakes below share one feature: each looks reasonable on its own. Claiming at 62 because the money is available. Keeping the allocation you held at 45 because it has done well. Leaving the 401(k) where it is because moving it feels like a decision. None of them is obviously wrong in the moment. They are wrong in combination, and the combination is only visible when the decisions are laid out together.
In the order they usually get made.
For anyone born in 1960 or later, claiming at 62 permanently reduces the monthly benefit relative to full retirement age at 67, and delaying to 70 permanently increases it. The individual break-even is the smaller question. For a couple, the higher earner's claiming age sets the survivor's income for life, and that scenario is the one most often skipped. Early claiming is sometimes right; unmodeled claiming never is.
Medicare does not start until 65. Retiring at 61 means four years of COBRA, a marketplace plan or a spouse's coverage, priced before the retirement date is set. Medicare then leaves premiums, deductibles, dental, vision and hearing to you, and it does not pay for custodial long-term care at all. One spouse's care event can consume assets the other needs for decades, so how care would be funded is an income-plan question, not an insurance question.
Most pre-retirees hold the bulk of their savings in traditional 401(k)s and IRAs, where every withdrawal is taxable income. Required minimum distributions begin at 73, or 75 for those born in 1960 or later, under SECURE 2.0. Badly timed withdrawals push income into a higher bracket, raise the Medicare premium surcharge two years later, and increase the tax on Social Security. The years before benefits start are often the lowest-income years available for Roth conversions; they close once income is fixed. Confirm the numbers with your CPA; this is not tax advice.
Sequence-of-returns risk is the danger on one side: a market decline in the first five years of withdrawals does damage no later recovery undoes. Holding too little in growth assets is the danger on the other, because a retirement of two or three decades has to keep pace with rising prices. Two checks match risk to need: how many years of withdrawals sit in cash and bonds so a decline never forces a sale, and whether the stock allocation reflects the income the plan needs rather than the allocation you held at 40.
Retirement income is mostly fixed: a Social Security check, perhaps a pension, and withdrawals. A credit card or personal loan payment comes out of that every month at a high rate and competes with essential spending. Paying it down while a paycheck still covers it is cheaper than paying it from withdrawals taxed as income, and clearing it first removes one of the most common reasons people claim Social Security early.
Claiming age changes the withdrawal order. The withdrawal order changes the tax path. The tax path changes the Medicare premium. The allocation decides whether the withdrawal order survives a bad year. A care event changes all of it. Made separately, each decision is made blind to the others. Made together, the trade-offs are visible before any of them becomes permanent.
Two spouses, three ages, one survivor.
The monthly difference between 62 and 70 is permanent and substantial, but it is the wrong number to anchor on. The right questions are what fills the income gap in the years before a delayed claim begins, which account that draw comes from and what it does to taxes, and what the surviving spouse receives under each combination of claiming ages. A common pattern is for the lower earner to claim earlier and the higher earner to delay, so that household income starts while the larger benefit, and the survivor benefit it becomes, keeps growing. Whether that pattern fits depends on both records, health, and the rest of the plan.
Claiming early can still be the right call: a health concern, an immediate income need with no other source, or a specific survivor strategy for the lower earner. The mistake is not early claiming. It is claiming without the comparison. Social Security planning describes how the comparison is built, and what a fiduciary adviser actually does in the claiming decision walks through the modeling step by step.
If any one of them has no answer, the retirement date is a guess.
Plaistow households tend to hit these questions early, because the town sits on the Massachusetts line at Route 125 and a large share of its pre-retirees spent careers at employers in Haverhill, Lawrence or along Interstate 495. That usually means a Massachusetts pension or a Massachusetts-taxed workplace plan on one side and New Hampshire's lack of an income tax on the other, which makes withdrawal order a two-state question before it is anything else. For Plaistow residents weighing a financial advisor, retirement planning and retirement income planning are the work that turns these five questions into answers. KBR Retirement & Investment Solutions serves Plaistow from Londonderry, about twenty minutes west on Route 111 and Route 102, and by video.
An independent, fee-only registered investment adviser in Londonderry, New Hampshire.
KBR Retirement & Investment Solutions, LLC is a registered investment adviser, paid only by its clients, that sells no products. Bernie Ross, in financial services since 1997, is the only person who advises clients. The work starts with tax returns, Social Security statements, pension and account statements and estate documents, all gathered before anything is recommended, and the claiming decision, the withdrawal order, the tax path, the allocation, the Medicare bridge, the care question and the workplace-plan decision are modeled together, with the survivor scenario and a bad first five years run against each. Retirement income planning describes the work; 401(k) and IRA rollovers covers the stay-or-move analysis; registration and the current Form ADV are linked from Disclosures.
When the claiming age fits your income gap, your health, your spouse's record and the survivor scenario, modeled together rather than from a break-even chart. For anyone born in 1960 or later, full retirement age is 67; claiming at 62 permanently reduces the monthly benefit and delaying to 70 permanently increases it. Early can be right when health or an immediate income need demands it. The mistake is deciding it in isolation before the rest of the income picture exists.
Enough to cover the bridge to Medicare if you retire before 65, then Medicare premiums, deductibles, dental, vision and hearing, which Medicare does not cover, plus a separate decision about how a long-term care event would be funded, because Medicare does not pay for custodial care. The number is specific to your retirement age, your coverage options and your health; price the bridge years before you set a date.
A withdrawal rate is an output of the plan, not an input. It depends on your spending, your guaranteed income, your tax path, your time horizon and how much of the first five years of withdrawals sit in cash and bonds. A fixed percentage applied without those inputs is where sequence-of-returns risk does its damage. Build the income schedule first; the sustainable rate falls out of it.
Possibly, in the years between leaving work and the start of Social Security and required minimum distributions, when taxable income is lowest and a conversion can be filled into a lower bracket. The trade-offs are tax paid now, the effect on Medicare premium thresholds two years later, and whether the money will stay invested long enough to recover the tax. Model it against your own brackets with your CPA; this is not tax advice.
Where each year's income comes from and from what date; which account each withdrawal is drawn from and what bracket it lands in; the Social Security claiming decision for both spouses; the Medicare bridge; what happens to income in a bad first five years; what the surviving spouse lives on; how a care event would be funded; and how much of monthly income debt still takes. Every one of those is a decision that interacts with the others.
Accumulation versus decumulation, the three risks, and the window that matters.
The 58-to-61 roadmap, decision by decision.
When the approach to retirement has outgrown self-management.
Bernie Ross is the founder of KBR Retirement & Investment Solutions, LLC, an independent, fee-only registered investment adviser in Londonderry, New Hampshire. He has worked in financial services since 1997 and personally handles the planning and services every client relationship. Read more about Bernie.
This article is general information and is not personalized investment, tax or legal advice. It does not consider your individual circumstances. Consult your CPA or attorney on tax and legal matters. Advisory services are offered through KBR Retirement & Investment Solutions, LLC, a registered investment adviser. Registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training. See Disclosures.
Bring your statements and last year's tax return. The first conversation costs nothing and commits you to nothing.