A portfolio in retirement is not competing with an index. It is funding a schedule. That changes how it is built and how it is judged.
Investment management at KBR Financial Solutions means building and maintaining a portfolio against your written income schedule rather than against a market benchmark. It covers allocation, the cash and short-term reserve that funds near-term withdrawals, account location across taxable, tax-deferred and Roth, rebalancing discipline, and cost. Assets are held at independent third-party custodians, so the firm does not take custody of client funds or securities.
For someone still working, comparing a portfolio to an index is at least a coherent question. For someone drawing income from it, it is close to meaningless.
A retiree's portfolio has a specific obligation: produce a defined amount of spending money each year for a defined period, without being forced to sell at the wrong time. Measured against that, a portfolio can beat its benchmark and still fail, or trail it and do exactly what was asked.
This is why the first input to the allocation is the income schedule rather than a risk questionnaire. How much is needed, in which years, and how much of it is already covered by Social Security or a pension, determine how much genuinely has to be exposed to markets at all.
Cost and tax location matter more once withdrawals begin, because both are certain while returns are not. Which assets sit in the taxable account versus the IRA versus the Roth affects the after-tax result independently of what markets do.
And the behaviour of the person holding it matters most of all. A defensible allocation that gets abandoned in a bad quarter performs worse than a plainer one that gets kept.
Ongoing management rather than a one-time allocation.
These are the questions asked at a review meeting. Notice that none of them is whether the portfolio beat the market last quarter.
| Question | Why it is the one that matters |
|---|---|
| Is the income schedule still fully funded? | This is the portfolio's actual job. Everything else is secondary to it. |
| Could we fund the next stretch of withdrawals without selling into a decline? | Determines whether a bad market becomes a permanent loss or a temporary one. |
| Has the allocation drifted from what the plan requires? | Drift changes the risk you are carrying without anyone deciding to change it. |
| Is the tax cost of how it is arranged still sensible? | Account location and realised gains are controllable in a way returns are not. |
| Has your situation changed? | A care event, a death, a sale, an inheritance or a new tax law can all reset the answer. |
| Would you be able to hold this in a bad year? | An allocation you would abandon is not the allocation you own. |
Allocation is set from the income schedule and your circumstances rather than from a template, so there is no single model portfolio that applies to everyone. What is consistent is the approach: diversified holdings, attention to total cost, a deliberate short-term reserve so withdrawals do not force sales at a bad moment, and rebalancing on a defined discipline. Specific holdings and the rationale for them are set out for you in writing, not left implicit.
Assets are held at independent third-party custodians. KBR does not take custody of client funds or securities, and your account statements come directly from the custodian rather than from the advisor. This is worth confirming with any advisor you speak to, and you can verify a firm's custody arrangements in its Form ADV.
No. The plan is built so that it does not require correctly predicting what markets will do next, because that is not a repeatable skill. What is planned in advance is the response to a downturn: which money gets spent, what gets rebalanced, and what stays untouched. Deciding that beforehand is more useful than reacting well in the moment.
KBR is fee-only, and advisory assets are billed as a fee. The firm receives no commissions, trails or third-party compensation. The current fee schedule, how it is calculated, and every conflict of interest are set out in the KBR brochure, which is linked in the disclosures at the bottom of every page.
Often, but not automatically. Consolidation makes the whole picture visible, simplifies rebalancing and makes required distributions easier to manage. Against that, an old employer plan may hold institutional pricing or a stable value option worth keeping, and there are situations where separate accounts serve a purpose. It is looked at case by case rather than assumed.
Bring your statements to a first conversation. It costs nothing and commits you to nothing.